The choice of laser treatment to address her son’s birthmark has ignited a wave of critique aimed at a mother, Brooke Atkins. Undeterred by the backlash, Brooke stands resolute, clarifying that her decision is rooted in deeper considerations than what critics may perceive.
Parenthood is a cherished aspiration for countless couples, offering boundless joys alongside formidable responsibilities. Among these priorities is the unwavering commitment to safeguarding a child’s well-being, happiness, and readiness for life’s challenges.
Brooke Atkins garnered widespread attention with her recent decision concerning her second son, Kingsley. Born with dark stains enveloping half his face, medical examinations revealed these to be port-wine stains stemming from vascular malformation. Particularly concerning was their proximity to Kingsley’s eyes, raising fears of Sturge-Weber syndrome and potential complications like glaucoma.
In collaboration with her partner, Kewene Wallace, Brooke sought medical intervention for Kingsley’s birthmark at the Queensland Children’s Hospital. Specialized consultations with dermatological and vascular experts recommended laser treatment as a means to preserve skin health and mitigate risks to surrounding tissues.
However, despite the medical rationale behind her decision, Brooke found herself besieged by criticism, with many decrying the move as superficial and excessive, leaving her grappling with guilt and uncertainty. Amidst the tumult of public opinion, some voices echoed empathy and understanding towards Brooke’s predicament.
In the face of such scrutiny, one might wonder how they would navigate similar circumstances. Parenthood often necessitates confronting weighty decisions that test the boundaries of one’s resolve. Ultimately, each parent must trust their instincts and make choices they believe are in the best interest of their child.
High fives to Morgan Freeman for transforming his ranch into a 124-acre honeybee sanctuary.
In an attempt to avert impending tragedy, Morgan Freeman has given honeybees access to his farm.
The world’s most beloved storyteller aspires to provide a fresh narrative for the declining honeybee population by granting them access to his 124 acres of property. In 2014, the 81-year-old actor turned his Mississippi property into a bee sanctuary after taking up beekeeping as a pastime. He planted acre upon acre of bee-attracting plants, such as clover, lavender, and magnolia trees, and brought in 26 bee hives from Arkansas.
He gave the bees sugar water to help them get used to their new habitat, and he claims that even though he hasn’t worn a cap or protective suit, he has never been stung. Freeman’s mission is to assist in repopulating the declining honeybee population; he does not collect honey from the bees or interfere with their hives.
Building a bee sanctuary, according to Freeman, is his way of contributing to the reconstruction of “the foundation of the growth of the planet.”
In a 2016 Larry King Live interview, Freeman described his motivation for converting his property into a haven for honeybees.
“Bee colonies have been losing a great deal, especially in this nation,” he informed King. “To the point where scientists are now warning that this is dangerous.”
Shortly after moving the hives to his property in 2014, Freeman spoke with Jimmy Fallon about his passion of beekeeping. “There is a concerted effort for bringing bees back onto the planet,” he added. “I believe they are the basis for the planet’s growth, the vegetation, but we are unaware of this.”
Honeybees and other insects are essential to human crop pollination. The loss of pollinators will negatively impact our food supply. Losing the bee population could have catastrophic effects on life as we know it.
Why do bees go extinct? There are several solutions, and a lot of them include human interference.
In a poll released last year by Auburn University and University of Maryland, American beekeepers reported that 40 percent of their colonies had collapsed the year before, a 33% rise from the year before. There are several different causes for the die-off.
For the past ten or so years, some bee species have been affected by colony collapse disorder. Numerous potential explanations have been proposed by scientists, including pesticides, environmental stressors, a lack of genetic variation within colonies, and mite infestations.
The survey’s researchers speculate that bees could be another victim of climate change. The weather and temperature have an impact on bee food and forage, according to Geoffrey Williams, an assistant professor at Auburn, who spoke to Bloomberg. It should be rather evident that bees that are already on the verge of collapse will fare less well in the event of a sudden and drastic change in the weather.
Moreover, pesticides are at fault. Commonly employed in agricultural regions, neonicotinoid pesticides kill bees and prevent them from reproducing. According to scientists, these chemicals gradually reduce bee populations and are especially hazardous to queen bees, which has an impact on bee populations over time.
Bravo to Freeman for building a wholesome haven for honeybees. We all have a responsibility to the environment, and every action we take to safeguard the environment has an impact.
Leave a Reply